Cognitive Psycho

Let's get one thing straight—no one just "discovered" physics or psychology out of thin air. Those fields had philosophical roots, deep ones, growing in the intellectual petri dish called "ancient thinking." Without philosophy, we wouldn’t even have the structure needed to start dissecting reality or, heaven forbid, our minds. Physics Was Philosophy's Playground Before It Got Cool People tend to think of physics as a crisp, no-nonsense science with formulas, calculations, and big machines. What they forget is that physics started as a bunch of guys in togas asking each other existential questions about rocks falling from the sky and stars moving around. Aristotle, the philosopher everyone skips in school, was the real father of physics —sorry, Newton. Physics wasn’t a hard science; it was armchair thinking about why things exist. Ancient thinkers believed that logic and observation could actually unlock the universe. And even if they got things hilariously w

So, you’re in the middle of a conversation, maybe about something big or even trivial, and there it is—that glazed-over look, the fixed misunderstanding. The words you’re saying don’t reach them; they don’t want them to. You’re in an argument with someone who’s not just disagreeing—they’re dedicated to misunderstanding you. And guess what? You’re wasting your time. 1. Their Goal Isn’t Understanding; It’s Victory Here’s the first thing to understand: people who argue to misunderstand aren’t trying to connect with you. They don’t want to understand your point; they want to dismiss it. They’re less interested in meaning than in winning the battle of “I’m right, and you’re irrelevant.” Engaging with this type of person is like trying to train a cat to fetch. Sure, it might make you feel better momentarily, but trust me— the cat (or your opponent) isn’t impressed. When their goal is to emerge victorious, no amount of explanation, logic, or even hard facts is going to sway them.